Skip to content
FIELDILIGENCE.
The TeamWhat We DoField NotesCommon QuestionsSchedule a Call ↗
Menu
The TeamWhat We DoField NotesCommon QuestionsSchedule a Call ↗
Field footage / 14.3 sec loop

Make better decisions with unmanned systems experts

We help investors, companies and governments evaluate technology through expert insight and independent field testing.

Understand what end users need, validated in the field

Schedule a Call ↗
15+ yearsHands-on experience with unmanned systems
30+ countriesField and industry experience
50+ technologiesTested and evaluated
Value Proposition

Technical depth, with a view of the whole operation.

A component can perform well while creating problems elsewhere in the system or operational workflow. A successful test can depend on specialist support the customer will not have. We examine those dependencies and explain what they mean for the decision-maker.

We work alongside your technical team, connect findings across disciplines and identify where further evidence is needed. You receive the findings, their implications and the next actions in one assessment.

Intelligence supported by AI

AI tools help us find, organize and compare technical and market information. Specialists check the sources and assess their relevance.

Testing and judgment led by people

Experienced practitioners define the assessment, work with operators and interpret results in context. They are responsible for the conclusions.

Partners
AM AN
Brave1
Entrepreneurs First
IDF Ground Forces
U.S. Navy
SOCOM
State of California
What we do

Our services

Technical due diligence, independent field testing, deployment readiness and technology intelligence for investment, acquisition and procurement decisions.

01Technical Due DiligenceBefore an investment, acquisition, or major technical decision.+

We assess technical claims, system performance, integration and operational risks, manufacturing, supply chain dependencies and the team’s ability to deliver.

You receive: An independent report with findings, risks, and recommendations.

Explore technical due diligence ↗
02Field ValidationBefore a customer test, deployment or expansion at scale.+

We test systems in relevant operating conditions and collect performance data and operator feedback.

You receive: Test results, identified gaps, and a prioritized list of improvements.

Explore field validation ↗
03Deployment ReadinessBefore entering a new market or scaling operations.+

We evaluate customer requirements, integration, maintenance, support, and operational costs.

You receive: A readiness assessment and a clear plan to address deployment gaps.

Explore deployment readiness ↗
04Technology IntelligenceWhen you need to find, compare, or evaluate new technologies.+

We identify relevant companies, assess technical fit, and support structured evaluations with specialists and operators.

You receive: Technology assessments, comparisons, and ongoing evaluation support.

Explore technology intelligence ↗
How an engagement works

From the question to the evidence you need

2026 field activity

What we’re working on

  • Operator feedback

    Multi-drone orchestration platform

    Gathering feedback from end users on how they would manage multiple drones from one platform.

  • Counter-drone technology

    Passive RF detection

    Evaluating passive radio-frequency detection for counter-drone use.

  • Deployment readiness

    Autonomous underwater vessel

    Assessing an autonomous underwater vessel before deployment.

  • Operational software

    VTOL management application

    Evaluating software used to manage vertical takeoff and landing operations.

  • Company evaluation

    Drone-in-a-box company

    Reviewing a company’s drone-in-a-box technology and how it fits the intended use.

  • Acquisition diligence

    Technical validation for a potential acquisition

    Checking technical claims and identifying evidence gaps ahead of an acquisition decision.

01

Scope

Define the decision, requirements and evidence gaps. Agree the work, fee and timeline.

02

Field & evidence

Review the claims, work with specialists and operators, and test where the question requires it.

03

Decision-ready report

Receive the findings, their implications and the actions to take before you commit.

From the Field

Real projects. Field evidence. Better decisions.

Unmanned aircraft and test equipment in a workshop
Field case / Insight Partners

Insight Partners

Independent technical and operational diligence to identify risks that could affect investment decisions and future deployment.

Explore Case ↗Close Case −

The brief

Support an investment evaluation with an independent view of the technology and its operational implications. The work connected technical claims with questions about future deployment, helping the investment team consider risks beyond a demonstration.

Our contribution

We brought technical and operational diligence into the evaluation. This perspective connects what a system can do with what customers will need to operate, integrate and support it. The purpose was to give the investment team evidence and context for its own assessment.

Decision value

The contribution was an independent assessment of risks relevant to investment and deployment. Fieldiligence did not make the investment decision. We do not attribute a transaction or investment outcome to our evaluation, and confidential findings are not reproduced here.

Company news: Easy Aerial funding ↗
Three participants near antenna equipment in a field
Field case / Insignito

Insignito

A week of field testing with the Navy in California led to new validation data, UTM integration, and a follow-on system installation.

Explore Case ↗Close Case −

California field week

We took part in a week of field testing with the Navy in California. This phase produced new validation data. It provided an opportunity to examine the technology in a field setting and connect evaluation with the needs of operational users.

What followed

UTM integration and a follow-on Airspace system installation followed the California testing week. These were subsequent steps, rather than activities all completed during the same field week. Keeping those phases separate makes the progression from testing to integration and installation clear.

Decision value

This case shows how field evaluation can contribute to the next stage of a technology’s development and use. The immediate output was new validation data; integration and installation came later. We do not publish performance figures or acceptance criteria here, and the sequence should not be read as a claim of Navy endorsement.

Company news: Insignito acquisition ↗
Hands-on drone work under a canopy
Field case / JIFX

JIFX

Connecting emerging technologies with operational users, field evaluation opportunities, and the requirements of future customers.

Explore Case ↗Close Case −

The setting

JIFX brings technology teams and operational users into a field experimentation environment. Our involvement connects emerging technologies with users, opportunities for evaluation and the requirements of potential future customers.

Our contribution

We help bridge the conversation between the people developing a system and the people who may use it. Field evaluation creates space to examine a technology in context and identify questions that deserve further testing. User requirements give those questions a practical direction.

Decision value

The value is a closer connection between technology development and operational needs. Participation is an opportunity to learn and evaluate; it is not a procurement award, certification or guarantee of adoption. The official program page below describes JIFX’s purpose and framework. It provides program context, rather than independent coverage of our specific participation.

Related Coverage ↗ Official JIFX program
Outdoor counter-UAS evaluation setting
Field case / Ministry of Defense

Ministry of Defense

Evaluating counter-UAS technologies beyond technical specifications to support operational and procurement decisions.

Explore Case ↗Close Case −

The brief

Evaluate counter-UAS technologies in relation to operational needs, rather than relying on technical specifications alone. The work supports the people considering how a system may be used and what evidence they need before a procurement or deployment decision.

Our contribution

We brought a field perspective to the evaluation of counter-UAS technologies. That means connecting stated capabilities with the operating context and the questions decision-makers need answered. Technical performance is one part of the assessment; its relevance to the intended use is another.

Decision value

The contribution is an assessment that connects technology with operational and procurement considerations. This public summary intentionally stays at that level. It does not disclose system identities, locations, test methods, performance findings or procurement outcomes. No specific capability improvement or purchase decision is claimed here. Further details can be discussed only where approved for release.

Our experience

The team behind the assessment

Three colleagues together at an outdoor field location
Together in the field
Founder & engagement lead

Shay Senior

Shay leads Fieldiligence with 15+ years of hands-on experience across unmanned aerial, ground, surface and underwater systems in more than 30 countries.

His work spans military and homeland security, agriculture and logistics, covering field testing, system integration, operator training and deployment. He works with engineers, operators and decision-makers at national and international levels.

Licensed UAV operator in Israel and the U.S.

Specialist expertise

Fieldiligence specialist networkCommunication, cyber security, integrations, procurement, production and navigation. Four distinct images show simulation, production, workshop and field activity.Cyber SecurityCommunicationIntegrationsProcurementProductionNavigationFieldiligenceSPECIALIST NETWORKAIRGROUNDUNDERGROUNDSEA

The proposal identifies the specialists, their roles and relevant experience for your assessment.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Why use Fieldiligence if we already have technical experts?

We work alongside your technical team. We add operator and buyer perspectives, test assumptions in relevant conditions and explain the implications for integration, cost and deployment.

How much does an engagement cost?

We quote against the scope: the systems involved, access, locations, specialists and testing required. After the first call, you receive a proposed fee and deliverables before committing. Ongoing support can be scoped separately.

How long does an assessment take?

The timeline depends on the decision deadline, available evidence and access to the system and operators. We agree a schedule before work starts and identify any dependencies, such as site access or test permissions.

What access do you need?

For an initial review, we need the question you are trying to answer and the evidence already available. Field work may also require access to the system, technical team, operators, logs and a suitable test location. We agree confidentiality and access before starting.

What happens on the first call?

You speak with Shay about the system, the decision and your deadline. We identify what is known, where evidence is missing and whether we can help. If there is a fit, the next step is a proposed scope, fee and timeline.

What will the report tell us?

You receive the findings, supporting evidence, limitations and recommended next actions. We distinguish what was observed from what remains unverified and explain what each finding means for your investment, procurement or deployment decision.

Field Notes

Conversations, perspectives and the terms that matter.

Listen

The Autonomous Podcast

Conversations with the people building, operating and investing in unmanned technology.

Listen to the podcast ↗
Read

LinkedIn Articles & Posts

Shay’s field observations and perspectives on technology, investment and deployment.

Read on LinkedIn ↗
Understand

The Unmanned Industry Glossary

The terms everyone in the room should know before building, buying or writing a tender.

Explore the glossary →
Start with a conversation

Discuss the assessment you need

Start with a call with Shay to discuss your decision, deadline and available evidence.

Company

Get a prioritized list of product and deployment gaps before committing to a customer trial or wider release.

Start intake →

Investor

Get an independent assessment of technical risks and customer requirements before an investment or acquisition.

Start intake →

Government

Get evidence against operational and procurement requirements before selecting a system or committing to a pilot.

Start intake →

After the call, we send a proposed scope, fee and timeline if there is a fit. Prefer to write? shay@fieldiligence.com

FIELDILIGENCE.Independent field validation.© 2026 Fieldiligenceshay@fieldiligence.com
Field Notes